"The problem" is in the solution, so things only get worse despite activists' best efforts. Two+ years since the dialectic was identified as the method of defective dominance with social activism, the problem remains.
Finally, this effort is feeling conclusive, which I hoped for from the outset 2+ yrs ago. With the discovery of the socialist emergence from the "Jewish settlements in the Pale," the pure negativity of academic oligarchy the possibility of scientific rehabilitation in an aboriginal context. Cultural "fleshing" will continue with reprints of currently-relevant recently-historical experiences, often gangster, while "the Pale" experience is solidified upto present revolutionary efforts. The hope is to create a hinge with which to restore revolution as evolution after the excessively long period of oligarchic occupation -since 500BC.
Occupy Monsanto: This is the first "critical inquiry"
Occupy Monsanto is pushing misinformation about Monsanto, for whatever reason. This weakens the case against Monsanto -- These kinds of internal problems are why I started this group. Every single change movement has had them, and these problems are why things stay the same and why the majority is afraid of change. For the 99% to come on board (really ~70%), the movement has to be completely honest, which means the liars need to get booted.
that is an insult -- you are saying that because I oppose misinformation (propaganda that will dilute the movement) that I am on the other team -- from recent experiences I can tell you without the remotest doubt that occupy has devolved into the European "mandarin" existential movement that spawned communism, the worst thing that happened to local Eurasian/African culture, with the possible exception of deBeers diamonds. Occupy is Plato's "when all kings are [oligarchic] philosophers" -- you can never underestimate European colonial tendencies
I have always known that the goal is not to defeat, but "flip" the enemy, which is the zen "art of war" -- to do this you have to be honest with them -- what I learned (that is new) just a couple years ago, is that "modern" thought, or "reason" otherwise called rational or enlightened thought, is based on the latin "ratio" -- in contrast, the indigenous or aboriginal thought is based on "sense" which is an emphatic (or emotional) relationship with the environment (sun, moon, water, land, animals, plants etc) -- we use sensible and rational interchangeably even thought sense represents human evolution, and reason represents the descent into rationalized cruelty for profit -- as Heinlein said "[modern] man is not a rational animal, but a rationalizing animal" -- See, not all us Euros are oligarchs ;) With "reason," motions are "rationally reduced with simplistic math (you get less, I get more) -- ironically, despite being named for the roman ratio, these human robots have no sense of proportion -- this simplistic math is best called "actuarial" or the math of insurance companies, who control the only commodity that we cannot provide for ourselves: medicine (the others are shelter, nice clothes, art, music, fun, and social organization)